Skip to main content

The Unbundled Age

The term "unbundled" comes from contemporary Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor, whose magnum opus, A Secular Age (2007), examines what happens to a society that transitions from widespread, default belief in God (the way we think of 1950s midwestern America) to one that considers faith just one possibility among many (depending on where you live, I think it's actually more likely to find widespread, default assumption of agnosticism).  I haven't read this entire book, but I did recently hear Charles Taylor give a talk about it at UCLA.  The book has been in print for a decade now, and his term "unbundled" has become common in some circles.  I'm thinking a lot about it in this charged political moment.

There were 750,000 participants in the LA Women's March in my neighborhood this weekend.  My friends and acquaintances are divided in their feelings about this event.  Some we elated; some felt it was healing after the election; some were inspired to dig in deeper in political activism; some felt excluded; some were disdainful; some were offended.  As various persons have expressed these reactions online, the responses have been impassioned.

It is apparent that, for some, being a woman is an identity marker that speaks to an essential nature.  Being a woman is a starting premise for the formation of political opinions, behaviors, and the way one should approach problems and challenges.  There is a sense of historical continuity afoot as well; there are heroic women from ages past who paved the way for us, and all women today should remember them, thank them, and honor their legacy by fighting for further equality.

Other voices on my screen find stronger identifying markers elsewhere, perhaps in a political party or a philosophical tradition or a religion.  These people are offended to find themselves at odds with other members of their gender.  I am thinking primarily of the pro-life women who felt unwelcome at the march, and I have also seen some friends cite racial reasons for choosing not to participate.  Other women simply voted for Trump, and, although they care deeply for women's causes, did not want to protest the official they helped to put in office.  Some opted out due to discomfort with the language used to describe female bodies, about which they prefer to be more discreet.

There's a mess of these reasons for opting in and opting out swirling around before my eyes.  So, let's think about Charles Taylor and "unbundling."  It's helpful here.  This idea refers to a cultural change where assumptions about people's beliefs that were once safe no longer are.  Perhaps there was a time when persons of a specific religion or race were likely to all vote the same way or care about the same issues.  Veterans would reliably show concern about a certain politician, stay at home moms all voted one way, Catholics always backed the pro-life candidate.  Likewise with the college educated, those living on coasts, those whose parents made a lot of money, etc.  Certain identity markers led to the reasonable expectation of other identity choices and beliefs.  Charles Taylor observes the recent destruction of these links, which were always arbitrary to begin with, and people are no longer packaged the way we'd expect them to be.  Someone can vote for a Republican and be passionately pro-choice.  Someone who always votes for Democrats could feel protective of their right to own a weapon.  We are much more likely now to isolate different compartments of our lives and parts of our identities - gender, race, sexual orientation, wealth, religion, education, ability, etc. - and form our beliefs on a case-by-case basis.

Henry David Thoreau once wrote, "The greatest compliment that was ever paid me was when one asked me what I thought and attended to my answer."  I think society is generally more aware of the dangers of assuming things about people based on their identities, and yet we are as unwilling as ever to sit and listen to people who are different from us. It's easy to get upset when the stakes are high, but there is a special message for me in this notion of unbundling people when we see their photos online.

Many of the passions people express outwardly are, at the root, confessions of pain.  Our lives unfortunately bring about instances of injustice and trauma and abuse, and so many of us make our Facebook posts and write our protest signs in response to these often-hidden tragedies.  Unbundling our expectations of one another can be an act of real compassion.

Simone Weil wrote that "It is better to say, 'I am suffering,' than to say, 'This landscape is ugly.'"  And yet, this is how we express our suffering, isn't it?  Our world can be entirely washed in the colors of our internal suffering so we see our surroundings as manifestations of pain.  I like to keep this quotation in mind every time I drown in proclamations of the ugliness of our national landscape.  The whisper beneath it is always "I am suffering," and that is a place where we can all meet each other.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Midwinter Spring, Sempiternal Though Sodden

The syllabus for our final class today in Theological Aesthetics read "Wolterstorff and Conclusion."  I chose my warmest coat when I left my apartment this morning, but the exertion of my hurried pace made me uncomfortably warm as I rushed to class, exacerbated no doubt by the ebb and flow of anxiety about the four essay topics spinning my head.  Professor Hare arrived a few minutes late today, a first, and moved briskly through his final thoughts about Wolterstorff and unity, richness and intensity, as well as the fittingness of a work of art to the purpose of worship.  And then on to the "Conclusion" part, which we all hoped and expected would be a review for the final exam.

Professor Hare brought us back to Raphael's painting The School of Athens, in which Plato and Aristotle, the princes of philosophy, are pictured at center.  Plato points upward, Aristotle inward.  Plato indicates that the forms are beyond us, Aristotle that we find what we need by lookin…

The Cocktail Party

I had drinks with a friend after a long seminar tonight, and for the first time in a while, I didn't stagger to my car exhausted and then sit in traffic for 90 minutes (that's right, it takes me 90 minutes to go 11 miles #LosAngeles) and then collapse for an hour and then go back to work for another 3 hours before crawling into bed (I am taking too many classes this quarter).  Instead, I had two glasses of wine and a little dinner, and I got to talk to a great person who is willing to share a lot of knowledge with me as well as some genuine pleasantness.  It reminded me of the olden days when my social life and my academic life were centered around the same place and task, and it lightened the load quite a bit.

That moment of levity at the end of the day.  Ah.  We need it.  No reading.  No striving.  No obligations.  The wine or cocktail is key.  You're always pausing when you have a drink.  You're being a little bad.  You're working against your evening productiv…

Hic Sunt Dracones

"In the middle of the journey of our life, I came to myself, in a dark wood, where the direct way was lost. It is a hard thing to speak of, how wild, harsh and impenetrable that wood was, and thinking of it recreates the fear. It is scarcely less bitter than death: but, in order to tell of the good that I found there, I must tell of the other things I saw there.

I cannot rightly say how I entered it. I was so full of sleep, at that point where I abandoned the true way. But when I reached the foot of a hill, where the valley, that had pierced my heart with fear, came to an end, I looked up and saw its shoulders brightened with the rays of that sun that leads men rightly on every road. Then the fear, that had settled in the lake of my heart, through the night that I had spent so miserably, became a little calmer. And as a man, who, with panting breath, has escaped from the deep sea to the shore, turns back towards the perilous waters and stares, so my mind, still fugitive, turned ba…